There was a total of 406 patients analyzed (average age 57 and 75% women). Of these, 53% received RFA and 47% received LA. About 94% of the nodules were completely solid or mostly solid with only 5% mostly fluid filled and 1% completely fluid filled. At the end of 5 years after initial treatment, there was an overall 77% reduction in size of the nodules undergoing RFA while LA resulted in an average of 57% reduction in size after 5 years.
In all, 28% of patients (115 patients) had nodule regrowth and 32 of them (28%) required retreatment. The main predictor of regrowth was the amount of energy delivered to the nodule by either technique (the lower the energy, the greater chance of regrowth). Overall, more nodules undergoing LA had regrowth as compared to RFA. A total of 46 patients (11%) ultimately had surgery remove their thyroid. Of the patients that ultimately had surgery for these presumed benign thyroid nodules, 35% had a thyroid cancer discovered. If the initial RFA or LA treatment resulted in < 20% decreased nodule size in the first year, this was more likely to mean the nodule had thyroid cancer in it.
WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS OF THIS STUDY?
RFA and LA are minimally invasive, non-surgical options for decreasing the size of bothersome thyroid nodules. Most nodules do not regrow, though RFA seems to be more effective overall. If the nodule does not shrink by > 20% a year after treatment, one should consider it may contain a thyroid cancer.
This study is important to patients as it shows an overall less invasive technique for shrinking bothersome thyroid nodules and suggests the treatment is likely to be successful with most nodules staying significantly smaller for at least 5 years. These techniques should not be used as primary treatment for known thyroid cancer, but if the nodules do not shrink as much as expected (<20% after the first year), the chance of thyroid cancer being present should be considered.
—Joshua Klopper, MD