![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
June 30, 2005 Steven Galson, M.D. Dear Dr. Galson: We are writing on behalf of our societies--the American Thyroid Association (ATA), The Endocrine Society (TES), and American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE)--to follow-up on the May 23, 2005 Thyroxine Equivalence Workshop that FDA co-sponsored with us. First, we would like to thank you for following through on Dr. Woodcock’s commitment to hold this meeting. Despite the long delay in convening the meeting, we appreciated the opportunity to voice our serious concerns about FDA standards for determining the equivalence of thyroxine formulations and present data in support of those concerns. Although you did not participate in the meeting after your welcome message, we assume that Dr. Orloff and his colleagues briefed you on the serious and unanimous concerns that were expressed by our three societies, representing approximately 8,000 clinical experts in thyroidology in the United States, and by organizations representing the 13 million Americans who take levothyroxine products for thyroid disorders. Those concerns are:
We heard from FDA a willingness to talk further with us about points 3 and 4 above. Our societies are currently considering our next steps and will be in touch with you again later this summer to discuss what steps you are willing to take to improve the safety and efficacy of thyroxine products. Respectively yours,
|
||||||
See related articles on Bioequivalence of Levothyroxine



